The Kerala High Court dismissed a writ petition as infructuous. Petitioner counsel argued the underlying matter was of no consequence, leading to immediate dismissal.
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
WP(C).No. 8350 of 2007 (R)
PETITIONER(S):
M/S.GOLD CITY, TANA, IRINJALAKKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER, K.R.SYLESHKUMAR, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O.LATE K.V.RAMAKRISHNAN.
BY ADV. SRI.C.C.THOMAS (SR.)
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE COMMERCIAL TAX OFFICER IRINJALAKKUDA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (APPEALS), COMMERCIAL TAXES, ERNAKULAM.
3. THE DEPUTY TAHSILDAR (RR), MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
R1 BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 09-12-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
W.P.(C).NO.8350 OF 2007 (R)
Dated this the 9th day of December, 2014
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that the matter has become infructuous. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
prp
M/S. Gold City, represented by K.R. Syleshkumar
The Commercial Tax Officer Irinjalakku da
The Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), Commercial Tax, Ernakulam
The Deputy Tahsildar (RR), Mukundapuram Taluk, Thirssur District
A.K. Jayasankaran Nambiar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
