Bava v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court held that the petitioner is entitled to pay land tax based on the sale deed even though legal heirs of the deceased owner were not parties. It directed the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's mutation claim within two months.
What did the court decide?
Direction to the 4th respondent to consider the petitioner's claim and pass appropriate orders for mutation within two months of the judgment.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/14TH JYAISHTA, 1936
WP(C).No. 7595 of 2014 (Y)
PETITIONER :
BAVA S/O.UNNY, MARAKAPARAMBIL HOUSE, MAMBRA THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH
RESPONDENT(S) :
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE TAHSILDAR
- MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK, IRINJALAKUDA-680 121.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to pay land tax based on a sale deed when legal heirs of the deceased owner were not parties to the sale.
Whether revenue authorities should consider the petitioner's claim for mutation of property purchased pursuant to Ext.P1 sale deed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BAVA S/O.UNNY
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA
- respondent
THE TAHSILDAR, MUKUNDAPURAM
- respondent
THE TAHSILDAR CHALAKUDY
- respondent
THE VILLAGE OFFICER KALLOOR
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court