Petitioner approached the High Court of Kerala for relief regarding housing loan arrears against the Union of India and Bank of Baroda. The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner had not filed any representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
TUESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/20TH KARTHIKA, 1936
WP(C).NO. 6802 OF 2014 (A)
PETITIONER:
ABDUL AZEEZ SHAREERKUTTY, SALAMATH HOUSE, (VATTAKAITHAYIL VEEDU) KAKKOTTUKONAM P.O, PALLIKKAL NEAR NAVAIKULAM, KILIMANOOR, TRIVANDRUM 695604
BY ADVS.SRI.P.S.RAMACHANDRAN PILLAI SRI.ANIL KUMAR M.SIVARAMAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEW DELHI- 110001.
2. THE CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER, BANK OF BARODA, FORT BRANCH, AKHILA BHARATHA AYYAPPA SEVA SANGHAM BUILDING, PADMAVILASOM ROAD, FORT P.O, TRIVANDRUM 695023
BY SRI.N.NAGARESH, ASGI
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 11-11-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
AS
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
W.P.(C)No.6802 OF 2014
Dated this the 11th November, 2014
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner has approached this Court with the following
prayers:
“i) issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order commanding the 2nd respondent to dispose of Ext.P2 representation filed by the petitioner and/or grant the petitioner the benefit of 6 monthly equal installments for the arrears of the housing loan accrued from March 2013 to March 2014 and also to regularise the future monthly installments from the month of May 2014 onwards and continue to pay in future monthly installments. ii). Such other or further reliefs which the petitioner may pray for from time to time and which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the interests of justice. iii) Costs of the proceedings.”
2. When the matter was listed on 22.09.2014, there was
no representation for the petitioner. The same was the position on 28.10.2014. Today also the position is not different. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in the cause of action
W.P.(C)No.6802 OF 2014
2
projected in this writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON JUDGE
lk
Abdul Azeez Shareerkutty
Union of India
The Chief Manager And Authorised Officer, Bank Of Baroda
P.R. Ramachandran Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
