Dismissed
R. Radhakrishnan v. the Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.
Kerala HCWP(C)/31569/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
WP(C).No. 31569 of 2014 (U)
PETITIONERS :
------------------
1. R. RADHAKRISHNAN, AGED 55 YEARS,
2. P.ANIL KUMAR,ASSISTANT ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), 220 K.V.SUB STATION, K.S.E.B LIMITED, KANJIRAMKUZHY, PERINAD P.O., KOLLAM.
3. A.NAZAR, ASSISTANT ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL) LINE MAINTENANCE SECTION, K.S.E.B LIMITED, KUNDARA KOLLAM.
4. M.NAZEEM,
SUB ENGINEER (ELECTRICAL), GENERATION SECTION,
K.S.E.B LIMITED, LOWER MEENMUTTI, PALODE THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.ELVIN PETER P.J. SRI.T.G.SUNIL (PRANAVAM) SRI.K.R.GANESH
RESPONDENTS :
----------------------
1. THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER (H.R.M), KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD LTD. VAIDYUTHI BHAVANAM, PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY SRI.K.S.ANIL, SC, KSEB
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08-12-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
WP(C).No. 31569 of 2014 (U)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS : NIL.
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
bp
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
W.P. (C) No. 31569 of 2014
Dated this the 8th day of December, 2014.
JUDGMENT
It is submitted that the issue involved in this case is
covered in favour of the petitioners by the judgment passed by this Court on 13.10.2014 in W.P.(C) No. 23966 of 2014. Accordingly, it is ordered that the directions issued in the
aforesaid judgment shall govern this case as well.
This writ petition is disposed of as above.
sd/- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, JUDGE.
rv
W.P.(Crl.)/W.A. No. -2-
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to allow the writ petition given coverage by a prior judgment of this Court.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.(C) No. 23966 of 2014Relied on¶2
R. RADHAKRISHNAN AND OTHERS
K S E B LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court