The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the petitioner submitted that the substantive issue no longer survives following the sanctioning of additional power load.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
MONDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/26TH JYAISHTA, 1936 WP(C).No. 26797 of 2010 (Y) ----------------------------
PETITIONER(S):
1. INDUS TOWERS LIMITED REPRESENTED BY DULY AUTHORISED HEAD (LEGAL), PREMAKRISHNAN NAIR M.N., 8TH FLOOR, VANKARATH TOWERS, N.H.BYPASS, PADIVATTOM KOCHI-682 024.
2. BHARATHI INFRATEL LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY MR.PREMAKRISHNAN NAIR M.N., N.H.BYE PASS, KUNDANNOOR, MARADU, KOCHI-682 304.
3. IDEA CELLULAR LTD., REPRESENTED BY PREMAKRISHNAN NAIR M.N., MERCY ESTATE, IIND FLOOR M.G.ROAD, KOCHI - 682 015.
BY ADV. SRI.P.SATHISAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, BOARD SECRETARIAT VYDYUTHIBHAVANAM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
3. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, ERATTUPETTA, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
4. ASSISTANT ENGINEER, ELECTRICAL SECTION, EZHAMKULAM, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
R1, R3 & R4 BY ADVS. SRI.P.P.THAJUDEEN, SC, K.S.E.B SRI.PULIKOOL ABUBACKER, SC, KSEB R2 BY ADVS. SRI.S.SREEKUMAR,SC,KSERC SRI.S.SUJIN, SC,ELECTRICITY REGULATORY COMMISSION SRI.P.NANDAKUMAR,SC,KSEB REGULATORY COMMISSION
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Pn
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.
W.P.(C). No. 26797 of 2010
--------------------------------------------------Dated this the 16th day of June, 2014
JUDGMENT
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that, in view of sanctioning of additional power load the issue involved in this writ petition no more survives for consideration.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE
/true copy/
P. A. to Judge
Pn
Indus Towers Limited and others
Kerala State Electricity Board
C.K. Abdul Rehim
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
