Joby.K.George v. Kerala State Electricity Board
Case brief
What is this about?
The court directed the 3rd respondent to adjudicate the dispute over network cable pole usage between the petitioner and 4th respondent. Continuance of operations and fresh agreements are permitted only after payment of arrears and the 3rd respondent's decision.
What did the court decide?
Directed 3rd respondent to adjudicate dispute on operational area provided pole rental arrears are paid.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 2014/12TH JYAISHTA, 1936
WP(C).NO. 194 OF 2014 (Y)
PETITIONER:
JOBY K.GEORGE, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O. KOSHY, V.TECH CABLE T.V. NETWORK, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY SRI.RENJITH THAMPAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE. ADV. SMT.P.R.REENA.
RESPONDENTS:
1. KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, VAIDYUTHI BHAVAN, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, PIN - 695 003, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
2. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER,
- ELECTRICAL DIVISION, KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD, ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT, PIN - 691 523.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the dispute regarding operational area of network cable service between petitioner and 4th respondent should be adjudicated by the 3rd respondent.
Whether the parties can execute fresh agreements and continue operations upon payment of pole rental arrears.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
JOBY K.GEORGE
- respondent
KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD
- respondent
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
- respondent
CHIEF ENGINEER, DISTRIBUTION
- respondent
PRASAD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court