reference under section 18 of the L.A. Act and on coming to know about it the petitioner submitted an application for redetermination of the compensation based on the said award under section 28(A) of the Act. The learned counsel further submitted that the enquiry on the said application is already over. In the said circumstances this writ petition can be disposed of with a directions to competent among respondents to pass appropriate orders on the application submitted by the petitioner under section 28A of the Act. As noticed hereinbefore, the very stand of the respondents is that the petitioner has not filed an application under section 18 of the Act. In the said circumstances, in case the application under section 28(A) was filed within the time stipulated statutorily there cannot be any impediment in considering the same and passing appropriate orders, in accordance with law and in fact the petitioner requires only such a consideration. In the said circumstances this writ petition is disposed of with a direction the second respondent to consider the application filed by the petitioner under section 28(A) of the Act, in accordance with law and pass appropriate orders thereon regarding on the request for redetermination of amount of compensation
