Sooraj.v. v. State of Kerala
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner declared excess teacher sought consequential steps after revisional order. Court disposed petition at admission stage, directing Fourth Respondent to effectuate order within three weeks and consider salary arrears.
What did the court decide?
Direction to Fourth Respondent to take consequential steps pursuant to Exhibit P7 within three weeks and consider salary arrears.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/18TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
WP(C).No. 14670 of 2014 (G)
PETITIONER(S): --------------
SOORAJ.V. H.S.A(ENGLISH), M.R.M.K.M.M.H.S.S., EDAVA, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DIST., PIN - 695 141.
BY ADV. SRI.KALEESWARAM RAJ.
RESPONDENT(S): -------------
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, declared as an excess teacher, is entitled to consequential steps pursuant to the revisional order passed on 12/08/2014.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
SOORAJ.V. H.S.A(ENGLISH), M.R.M.K.M.M.H.S.S., EDAVA, VARKALA
- respondent
STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL EDUCATION
- respondent
THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTIONS, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- respondent
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
- respondent
DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, ATTINGAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court