C.P. Yakob v. the Secretary
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court directed the Regional Transport Authority to consider the petitioners' objections to provisional timings granted to a rival service operator and pass appropriate orders within one month.
What did the court decide?
The first respondent is directed to consider the petitioners' objections and pass appropriate orders within one month.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.SURENDRA MOHAN
THURSDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/22ND JYAISHTA, 1936
WP(C).No. 12897 of 2014 (J)
PETITIONER(S) :-
1. C.P. YAKOB, CHIRANGARA HOUSE, RAYAMANGALAM, KURUPPAMPADY PERUMBAVOOR.
2. SHIBU, KADUNNINAL HOUSE, RAYAMANGALAM, KURUPPAMPADY PERUMBAVOOR
BY ADV. SRI.P.DEEPAK
RESPONDENT(S) :-
1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA 686661
2. WILSON, KUZHIKKADAN HOUSE, PUTHUMANA, KOMBANAND P.O PERUMBAVOOR – 683542.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the first respondent should consider the petitioners' objections to the provisional timings granted to the second respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
C.P. YAKOB
- petitioner
SHIBU
- respondent
THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY, MUVATTUPUZHA
- respondent
WILSON
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court