Thressia v. George
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala dismissed a review petition in a land reform dispute, holding that the grounds raised amounted to an appeal in disguise based on erroneous evidence appreciation rather than an error apparent on the face of the record.
What did the court decide?
Review petition dismissed; no correction of error on face of record found.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2014/18TH ASWINA, 1936
RP.No. 465 of 2014 () IN RSA.711/2007
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN RSA 711/2007 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 21-05-2014.
REVIEW PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANTS:
--------------------------------
1. THRESSIA, AGED 77 YEARS, W/O. JOSEPH, KALLUPURATH, PALLIPURAM KARA, PALLIPURAM VILLAGE, KOCHI TALUK (DIED)
2. MARY, AGED 72 YEARS, D/O. MARIYAM, RANDUTHAIKKAL, -DONOW RESIDING AT SRAMBICKAL HOUSE, NEAR ANGAMALY POLICE STATION.
3. PHILOMINA, AGED 69 YEARS, D/O. MARIYAM, -DO- AND W/O. SAURIYAR, MUNDAKKAL HOSE, CHOORNIKARA, ALUVA VILLAGE.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the review petition is maintainable on grounds of erroneous appreciation of evidence rather than error apparent on the face of the record.
Whether the grounds raised constitute an error apparent on the face of the record warranting review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
THRESSIA AND ORS.
- respondent
GEORGE AND ORS.
Coram
K. HARILAL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court