This review petition sought clarification that specific judgments do not bar the petitioner from challenging future disciplinary proceedings on legal grounds, including non-compliance with statutory enquiry requirements.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
MONDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2014/5TH JYAISHTA, 1936
RP.No. 259 of 2014 ()
-------------------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 2216/2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 12-02-2014
REVIEW PETITIONER/ WRIT PETITIONER :
V.P.PRASADU, FARM SUPERINTENDENT REGIONAL AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH STATION, AMBALAVAYAL, WAYANAD - 673593 RESIDING AT: VATTODIL HOUSE AYYAPPANKOVIL P.O., MATTUKADA,
IDUKKI - 685507.
BY ADVS.SRI.MURALI PURUSHOTHAMAN
SRI.DEEPU LAL MOHAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :
1. KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA, THRISSUR - 680656 REPRESENTED BY THE REGISTRAR
2. THE REGISTRAR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERISTY, VELLANIKKARA THRISSUR - 680656.
3. THE VICE CHANCELLOR, KERALA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, VELLANIKKARA THRISSUR - 680656.
R1 TO R3 BY ADV. SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA, SC
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-05-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
...2/-
RP.No. 259 of 2014 ()
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE A : PHOTOCOPY OF NOTICE NO. GA/L3/37801/2011 DATED 13-2-2014 ISSUED TO THE PETITIONER BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE B PHOTOCOPY OF ENQUIRY REPORT FURNISHED TO THE PETITIONER ALONG WITH ANNEXURE - A NOTICE.
ANNEXURE C PHOTOCOPY OF REPLY DATED 28-2-2014 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE D PHOTOCOPY OF ORDER NO. GA/L3/37801/2011 DATED 14-3-2014 ISSUED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.S. TO JUDGE
Mn
C.K.ABDUL REHIM,J.
RP.NO. 259 of 2014 in WP(C).No.2216/2014
Dated this the 26th day of May, 2014
JUDGMENT
The purpose for which this review petition is filed is evidently a clarification sought for to the effect that the observations contained in the judgment will not stand in the way of the petitioner challenging the proceedings if any initiated for finalising the disciplinary action, if the enquiry conducted is not in accordance with statutory provisions.
C.K.ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE
pmn/
WP(C). 32142 /2009 2
WP(C). 32142 /2009 3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether observations in the judgment preclude the petitioner from challenging disciplinary proceedings if the enquiry is not conducted in accordance with statutory provisions.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WP(C). 32142 /2009Referred¶40
V.P. Prasadu
Kerala Agricultural University
C.K. Abdul Rehim
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
