The single Judge dismissed this review petition arguing that the judgment below did not suffer from any error apparent on the face of the record on law or facts and was devoid of merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/10TH BHADRA, 1936
RP.No. 1090 of 2012 IN AS.253/1995
JUDGMENT AND DECREE IN AS 253/1995 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT/3RD DEFENDANT :
PERUVANIYAN JANAKI AMMA, D/O. KALLIANI AMMA, KANNAVAM AMSOM, THODEEKKALAM DESOM.
BY ADV.SMT.SUMATHY DANDAPANI (SR.)
SRI.CIBI THOMAS
RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFF/DEFENDANTS 1&2 AND Lrs OF R2 :
RP.No. 1090 of 2012 IN AS.253/1995
R1,R3&4 BY ADV. SRI.B.KRISHNAN R1,R3&4 BY ADV. SRI.R.PARTHASARATHY SRI.R.K.MURALEEDHARAN(COMMISSIONER)
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-09-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
B.KEMAL PASHA, J.
Review Petition No.1090 of 2012
Dated this the 1st day of September, 2014
O R D E R
This court has carefully gone through the Review Petition
and heard both sides. On going through the grounds taken up in
the Review Petition and on hearing either sides, this court is of the
view that the judgment passed by this court does not call for any interference at all, as any error apparent on the face of the record could not be traced out. The judgment does not suffer from any error, either on law or on facts. Matters being so, this Review Petition is devoid of merits, and is only to be dismissed, and I do
so.
In the result, this Review Petition is dismissed. Sd/-
B.KEMAL PASHA , JUDGE
dl
// TRUE COPY //
Peruvaniyan Janaki Amma
Peruvaniyan Narayana Kurup
B. Kemal Pasha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
