schedule building for conducting a business of his own. Both the authorities found that the need put forward by the landlord is genuine. The only other matter which was directed to be considered while remanding the case was whether the landlord, after getting eviction of buildings from two tenants, had converted those small rooms into halls and let out to other tenants and whether the landlord's brother could have occupied those small rooms for the purpose of establishing his business. On the basis of the evidence on record, the Appellate Authority held that there is no evidence to show that small rooms were converted into halls and let out to other tenants. On the other hand, the evidence would disclose that the other buildings in the possession of the landlord, as pointed out by the tenant, consist of two halls, one in the ground floor and the other in the first floor, and those floors had been let out for running a hotel as well as for the occupation of Houseboat Owners' Association. The Appellate Authority held that the requirement for the brother of the landlord is only to start a stationery shop and for that purpose it is not necessary to occupy the big halls which became vacant and one of which was let out to run the business of hotel and another hall to the Houseboat Owners' Association. It is for the landlord to
