Disposed

Prasantha K. v. Rajendran

Kerala HC10 Jan 2014OP(C)/92/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought directions for the Munsiff Court to consider objections in an execution petition where respondents had entered appearance but no order was passed. Court disposed of the opinion by directing the Munsiff to pass appropriate orders.

What did the court decide?

Directing the Munsiff Court to consider objections raised in the execution petition and pass appropriate orders at the earliest.

Prasantha K. Vs Rajendran — Execution and Attachment | Kerala HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN

¶4

FRIDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF JANUARY 2014/20TH POUSHA, 1935

¶5

OP(C).No. 92 of 2014 (O)

¶6

------------------------O.S.No.149/2002 OF MUNSIFF'S COURT, DEVIKULAM

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/DECREE HOLDER/PLAINTIFF :-

¶8

PRASANTHA K., AGED 48 YEARS, W/O.RAJENDRAN, THUSHARAM VEEDU, K.P.VII/149B KOVILKADAVU KARA, KANTHIPPARA VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK, IDUKKI DISTRICT.

¶9

BY ADV. SRI.M.R.ARUNKUMAR

¶10

RESPONDENT(S)/JUDGMENT DEBTORS/DEFENDANTS :-

¶11

1. RAJENDRAN, AGED 54 YEARS, S/O.LATE MADAVAN, SUB CONTRACTOR, KOLLASSERIYIL VEEDU, DANDUKOMBU BHAGOM, KOVILKADAVU KARA, KANTHALLOOR VILLAGE, DEVIKULOM TALUK, IDUKKI - 685 620.

¶12

2. SHYLAJA, LIVING TOGETHER WITH RAJENDRAN, D/O.KRISHNAN NAIR, HOUSE-HOLD AFFAIR, KOLLASSERIYIL VEEDU, DANDUKOMBU BHAGOM, KOVILKADAVU KARA, KANTHALLOOR VILLAGE, DEVIKULOM TALUK, IDUKKI - 685 620.

¶13

THIS OP (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-012014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

jvt

¶15

OP(C).No.92 OF 2014

¶16

APPENDIX

¶17

Petitioner's Exhibits :-

¶18

Ext.P1 :- COPY OF THE DECREE IN O.S.No.149 OF 2002 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, DEVIKULAM DATED 4.3.2003. Ext.P2 :- COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN O.S.No.149 OF 2002 ON THE FILE OF THE MUNSIFF'S COURT, DEVIKULAM DATED 4.3.2003.

¶19

Ext.P3 :- COPY OF THE EXECUTION PETITION AND AFFIDAVIT FILED BEFORE THE MUNSIFF'S COURT DEVIKULAM IN O.S.No.149 OF 2002 ON 11-10-2011.

¶20

Respondent's Exhibits :- NIL.

¶21

//True Copy//

¶22

P.A. to Judge

¶23

N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J.

¶24

-------------------------------O.P.(C). No.92 of 2014

¶25

Dated this the 10^th day of January 2014

¶26

J U D G M E N T

¶27

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that in the execution petition filed by the petitioner, the respondents have entered appearance, but, no order has been passed in the execution petition. The learned Munsiff will consider the objections and pass appropriate orders at the earliest.

¶28

This OP(C) is disposed of as above.

¶29

Sd/N.K.BALAKRISHNAN,

¶30

JUDGE.

¶31

Jvt

Prasantha K. v. Rajendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Prasantha K. v. Rajendran

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

P.S. Viswanathan Vs Spl. Tahsildar

Devaki Amma Vs Ramachandran Pillai

Sini Chandra Vs Neelambaran

K.P Remanan Vs Smt. Rajamma

Francis Vs Jose

Balakrishnan Nair Vs Lathika