Anilkumar v. Vimala
Case brief
What is this about?
Ordinary Petition filed to challenge a decree in a civil suit. The High Court held the petition infructuous as the underlying suit had already been disposed of in favor of the plaintiff. The petitioner is advised to file an appeal if any.
What did the court decide?
Petition closed as infructuous; appellant directed to file appeal if contentions exist.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
WEDNESDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF JANUARY 2014/2ND MAGHA, 1935
OP(C).No. 437 of 2012 (O)
IN OS 1937/2007 of PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF COURT, IRINJALAKUDA
PETITIONER(S):
ANILKUMAR AGED 53 YEARS S/O.KADUKUTTY VELUNNI, AVITTATHUR DESOM KADUPASSERY VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.K.RAVI (PARIYARATH)
RESPONDENT(S):
1. VIMALA
W/O.NEELATHUKATTIL THILAKAN, KUZHIKATTUSSERY DESOM THAZHEKAD VILLAGE, MUKUNDAPURAM TALUK-680683.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Anilkumar
- respondent
Vimala
- respondent
Usha
- respondent
Mihira
- respondent
Vanaja
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court