adduced to enable the court to arrive at a right conclusion. The reference court observed that the claimant has not stated any amount of the land value in her claim statement. In chief examination she claimed that the probable value of the property will be between 1.5 lakhs to 2 lakhs per cent. The court below rightly observed that the claimant has not produced any documents to show that any property in the neighbourhood has been sold for similar amount. It is also noticed that though the claimant mentioned various establishments in the vicinity, the distance of said properties are not mentioned. At the same time, the court below without any supporting evidence, fixed 75,000/- per cent (1,85,250/- per Are) as the land value as against the land value of 18,876/- per Are fixed by the Land Acquisition Officer. In the absence of datas or documents to arrive at a conclusion regarding the probable value of the property, the reference court is not justified in fixing a sum of 75,000/- per cent as land value. In the absence of any evidence, we are not in a position to accept the value fixed by the reference court or the reasons stated for fixing the land value. At the same time, we direct that the claimant shall be given another opportunity to adduce evidence to prove the real market value of the property. The compensation fixed by the reference court as regards the tree value and structures available need not be re-
