Ratheesh Kumar v. Sadanandan Shaji
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge dismissed the First Appeal as infructuous without detailed reasoning or substantive discussion of the merits.
What did the court decide?
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
MONDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014/31ST BHADRA, 1936
FAO.No. 107 of 2011 ( )
AS 124/2000 of III ADDITIONAL DISTRICT COURT, KOLLAM
APPELLANTS/PETITIONERS/DEFENDANTS:
RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:
SADANANDAN SHAJI, VADANKUZHI VEEDU, KURUMANDAL, PARAVOOR NOW EMPLOYED IN SUTANATE OF OMAN P.B.NO.123, SHINAS : 324, OMAN.
THIS FIRST APPEAL FROM ORDERS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-09-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
dl/
B. KEMAL PASHA, J.
F.A.O. No.107 of 2011
Dated this the 22nd day of September, 2014
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that
this F.A.O. has become infructuous. Accordingly, this F.A.O. is dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE)
aks/22/09
// True Copy //
PA to Judge
RATHEESH KUMAR, J.RADHAMANY
SADANANDAN SHAJI
B. KEMAL PASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court