Davis Mampilly v. v.T.Thomas
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.HARILAL
THURSDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF OCTOBER 2014/1ST KARTHIKA, 1936
Crl.Rev.Pet.No. 489 of 2004 (A)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CRL.A. 545/2002 of SESSIONS COURT, KOTTAYAM DATED 21-11-2003
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN CC 81/1998 of J.M.F.C.-II, KOTTAYAM DATED 03-12-2002
REVISION PETITIONER(S)/APPELLANT/ACCUSED::
------------------------------------------
DAVIS MAMPILLY, MAMPILLY HOUSE, NJARAKKAL P.O., ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.K.K.SATHEESH
RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT::
---------------------------
1. V.T. THOMAS @ TOMS, CARTOONIST, ATHIKALAM HOUSE, MUTTAMBALAM P.O., KOTTAYAM.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
R1 BY ADV. SRI.MATHEW JOHN (K) SRI.SUJESH MENON V.B. R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.C.K. JAYAKUMAR.
THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 23-10-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
K. HARILAL, J.
Crl.R.P. No. 489 of 2004
-----------------------------------------------------Dated this the 23rd day of October, 2014
ORDER
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submits that the revision petitioner expired on 21/8/2011 and he filed a memo to that effect also. Thereafter, he has no instruction from the legal heirs of the revision petitioner. Hence it could reasonably be presumed that the legal representatives are not interested in prosecuting this matter. Consequently, this revision petition will stand dismissed for nonprosecution.
Sd/-
(K. HARILAL, JUDGE)
Nan/
//true copy//
P.S. to Judge
Davis Mampilly
V.T. Thomas @ Toms
State of Kerala
K. Harilal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court