Shajahan v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners sought quashing of an FIR for cheating. The court noted cognizance had been taken in a warrant case trial and refused to quash, directing petitioners to seek discharge during the trial instead.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.T.RAVIKUMAR
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/13TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
Crl.MC.No. 968 of 2011 ( )
(CRIME NO. 7/2011 OF ERAVIPURAM POLICE STATION , KOLLAM)
PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 & 2:
- SHAJAHAN, S/O.YOOSUFUKUNJU, AGED 43 YEARS, MANAGING DIRECTOR BHARATH TOURS AND TRAVELS, HAJJ AND UMRA SERVICE BHARATH TOWER, OPPOSITE OF TALUK CUTCHERY KOLLAM DISTRICT.
- HASEENA BEEGAM, W/O.SHAJAHAN, PANDALAYIL HOUSE, AIKKA NAGAR, VADAKKEVILA, KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.C.RAJENDRAN
RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:
- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should quash an FIR and subsequent proceeding where a challan has already been filed in a warrant case trial.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Shajahan
- petitioner
Haseena Beejam
- respondent
The State of Kerala
- respondent
Muhammed Farook
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court