Rajagopala Pillai v. Ayyappan Pillai
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner, defacto complainant acquitted by trial court, sought direction to appellate court to suspend its pending appeal pending Supreme Court decision. High Court held relief not grantable in law but observed appellate court may reasonably wait, leaving matter to its discretion. Miscellaneous case closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.UBAID
THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/20TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
Crl.MC.No. 4579 of 2014 ()
CRA 30/2013 of ADDL.DISTRICT COURT-I,MAVELIKKARA CRIME NO. 227/2010 OF KURATHIKADU POLICE STATION , ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER/APPELLANT/DEFACTO COMPLAINANT:
RAJAGOPALA PILLAI SREERAJ NIVAS, THEKKEKARA, KALLUMALA UMBERNADU, MAVELIKARA.
BY ADV. SRI.P.SREEKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS/ACCUSED AND COMPLAINANT:
1. AYYAPPAN PILLAI
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant direction to the appellate court to keep the pending criminal appeal pending till the Hon'ble Supreme Court decides the special leave petition.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
RAJAGOPALA PILLAI SREERAJ NIVAS
- respondent
AYYAPPAN PILLAI
- respondent
VENUGOPAL
- respondent
SUDHAKARAN
- respondent
CHANDRAN UNNITHAN
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court