under Sec.482 of the Cr.P.C. is of wide plenitude with no statutory limitation, but it has to be exercised in accordance with the guideline engrafted in such power viz., (i) to secure the ends of justice, or (ii) to prevent the abuse of the process of any court, etc. That where the High Court quashes a criminal proceeding having regard to the fact that the dispute between the offender and the victim has been settled although the offences are not compoundable, it does so as in its option, continuation of criminal proceedings will be an exercise in futility and justice in the case demands that the dispute between the parties put to an end and peace is restored and placing the ends of justice as the ultimate guiding factor. It has been held therein in paras 55 and 56 that in the very nature of its constitution, it is the judicial obligation of the High Court to undo a wrong in course of administration of justice or to prevent the continuation of unnecessary judicial proceedings. That whenever anything is authorised and especially if, as a matter of duty, required to be done by law, it is found impossible to do that thing unless somethingelse not authorised in express terms be also done, may also be done, then that something else will be supplied by necessary intendment and that ex debito justitiae is inbuilt in
