Petitioner in Crl.MC.No.2958/2014 withdrew petition as Sessions Court suspended sentence; High Court dismissed application as not pressed. Order dated June 23, 2014.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
MONDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2014/2ND ASHADHA, 1936
Crl.MC.No. 2958 of 2014 (B)
AGAINST THE ORDER IN ST 301/2013 of JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISATRATE COURT - II, NORTH PARAVUR
PETITIONER(S):
PRAKASH M KAMMATH AGED 36 YEARS S/O.MURALEEDHARAN KAMMATH, ALINKALPARAMBU HOUSE KARANAKODAM VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM, PIN 682 025.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.R.VINOD MS.JENCY SUSAN JOSE SRI.V.SRI NATH
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA 682 031.
2. ABHILASH, AGED 32 YEARS S/O.SASEENDRAN, MEDAKKAL HOUSE, ELOOR SOUTH ELOOR VILLAGE, ERNAKULAM 686 320.
R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. S.HYMA
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-06-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Crl.MC.No. 2958 of 2014 ()
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS
ANNEXURE-I: THE COPY OF THE MEMORANDUM OF CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.228/14 FILED BEFORE THE SESSIONS COURT, ERNAKULAM.
RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS
NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
JJJ
K.RAMAKRISHNAN, J.
Crl.M.C. No. 2958 of 2014
Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2014
O R D E R
When this application came up for hearing today, counsel for the petitioner submitted that since Sessions Court has already suspended the sentence, the petitioner is not pressing this petition. The above submission of the counsel for the petitioner is recorded and petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JUDGE
jjj
Prakash M Kammath
State of Kerala
Abhilash
K. Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
