Quashed

Sadique v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC20 Mar 2014Crl.MC/1673/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam issued an order quashing criminal proceedings (C.C. No.803/2013) against four accused under Section 498A IPC. The petitioners were accused in a dowry cruelty case. The second respondent, the de facto complainant, filed an affidavit stating the matter was settled out of court and she did not wish to prosecute. Relying on this settlement, the court quashed furth

What did the court decide?

Further proceedings in C.C. No.803/2013 before the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Mannarkkad, were quashed.

Sadique Vs State of Kerala — Dowry and Cruelty | Kerala HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MARCH 2014/29TH PHALGUNA, 1935

¶5

Crl.MC.No. 1673 of 2014 (G)

¶6

AGAINST THE ORDER IN CC 803/2013 of J.M.F.C., MANNARKAD

¶7

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED 1-4:

¶8

1. SADIQUE.P.A AGED 37 YEARS S/O.LATE P.K.ABDUL KARIM, PALLACHI HOUSE, ARAKKAKADAVU VENNALA.P.O., KOCHI-28.

¶9

2. P.A.MOHAMMED ALI AGED 43 YEARS S/O.LATE P.K.ABDUL KARIM, PALLACHI HOUSE, ARAKKAKADAVU VENNALA.P.O., KOCHI-28.

¶10

3. ANWAR SADATH P.A AGED 27 YEARS S/O.LATE P.K.ABDUL KARIM, PALLACHI HOUSE, ARAKKAKADAVU VENNALA.P.O., KOCHI-28.

¶11

4. SUHARA ASHRAF AGED 46 YEARS D/O.LATE P.K.ABDUL KARIM, PALLACHI HOUSE, ARAKKAKADAVU VENNALA.P.O., KOCHI-28.

¶12

BY ADVS.SRI.M.K.DAMODARAN (SR.) SMT.A.PARVATHI MENON SRI.P.SANJAY

¶13

COMPLAINANT(S)/RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE:

¶14

1. STATE OF KERALA

¶15

REPRESENTED BY S.I.OF POLICE, NATTUKAL REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

¶16

2. NOORJAHAN, AGED 25 YEARS D/O.B.H.MAMMI, BEHIND NESTLE GODOWN, RAHATH MANZIL CHERANALLOOR, COCHIN-34, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

¶17

R2 BY ADVS. SRI.LAL K.JOSEPH SRI.A.A.ZIYAD RAHMAN SMT.T.A.LUXY SRI.JOSEPH KURIAN VALLAMATTAM SRI.V.S.SHIRAZ BAVA R1 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

¶18

THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-03-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶19

Crl.MC.No. 1673 of 2014 (G)

¶20

APPENDIX

¶21

PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS

¶22

ANNEXURE A1	-	TRUE COPY OF THE FIR OF CRIME NO.201/2011 DATED 08.08.2011.
ANNEXURE A2	-	TRUE COPY OF THE FINAL REPORT IN CC NO.803/2013 OF THE JUDICIAL FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE COURT, MANNARGHAT DATED 31.08.2011.
ANNEXURE A3	-	TRUE COPY OF THE MEDIATION REPORT DATED 9.11.2012 OF THE MEDIATION CONDUCTED AT THE MEGA LOK ADALATH HELD UNDER THE AUSPICES OF THE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM.
ANNEXURE A4	-	TRUE COPY OF THE MODIFIED COMPROMISED AGREEMENT DATED 20.12.2012 AFFIDAVIT OF THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
ANNEXURE A5	-	TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER IN M.C.NO.370/11, AND O.P.NO.2391/11 DATED 20.12.2012 AND COMMON JUDGMENT IN OP.NO.2371/2011, O.P.NO.2372/2011 AND O.P.NO.653/2012 OF THE HONOURABLE FAMILY COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 20.12.2012.
ANNEXURE A6	-	TRUE COPY OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND ORDER IN I.A.NO.3881/2013 IN O.P.NO.2371/11 & O.P.NO.2372/2011 & O.P.653/2012 DATED 01.03.2014.

¶23

RESPONDENT(S)' EXHIBITS

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A.TO JUDGE

JJJ

N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, J.

¶29

Crl.M.C. No. 1673 of 2014 (G)

¶30

Dated this the 20^th day of March, 2014

¶31

O R D E R

¶32

Petitioners are accused in C.C. No.803/2013 of

¶33

Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Mannarkkad. The offence alleged is under sections 498A r/w 34 of IPC.

¶34

The 2^nd respondent is the defacto complainant.

¶35

She is represented in this court by her counsel. She has filed affidavit stating that the entire matter has been settled out of court and that she does not want to prosecute the matter.

¶36

In the light of the settlement so arrived at, further proceedings in C.C. No.803/2013 of Judicial First

¶37

Class Magistrate Court, Mannarkkad, is quashed.

¶38

Sd/-

¶39

N.K. BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE

¶40

//True Copy//

¶41

P.A. to Judge

¶42

jjj Hand Over

Sadique v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sadique v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

C.P.Navas Vs the S.I of Police

Abhilash Vs State of Kerala

Sobin Vs State of Kerala

T.D Shajan Vs Sub Inspector of Police

Subin Vs State of Kerala

Krishnan Vs Sheeba