Dismissed
C.L.Thomas v. K.K.Chandran
Kerala HCCRL.A/938/2005
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/10TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
CRL.A.No. 938 of 2005 ( )
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN 201/2005 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 18-03-2005
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN ST 429/2002 of J.M.F.C.-II,THRISSUR DATED 4.11.2004
APPELLANT(S)/COMPLAINANT:
SRI.C.L. THOMAS, AGED 56, S/O. LONAPPAN, CHEMUNDA HOUSE, CHIYYARAM VILLAGE THRISSUR.
BY ADVS.SRI.THIYYANNOOR RAMAKRISHNAN
SRI.ARUN KUMAR.P SRI.C.CHANDRASEKHARAN
1ST RESPONDENT/ACCUSED/2ND RESPONDENT:
1. SRI.K.K. CHANDRAN, AGED 41, KALLADA HOUSE, VELLIYANNOOR, THRISSUR.
2. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.K.N.PADMAKUMAR
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-12-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
==================
Crl.Appeal No. 938 of 2005
==================
Dated this the 1st day of December, 2014
J U D G M E N T
The counsel for the appellant in this case submits that respondent No.1 (accused) has died and therefore the appeal can be closed as abated. In view of this submission, the Crl. Appeal stands
dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
sdk+
ALEXANDER THOMAS, JUDGE
///True copy///
P.S. to Judge
SRI.C.L. THOMAS
K.K. CHANDRAN
STATE OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court