Disposed
M.a.Abdul Naseer v. S.Rajamanikyam
Kerala HCCon.Case(C)/989/2014
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
MONDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/26TH KARTHIKA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 989 of 2014 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 12122/2013 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 14-06-2013
NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WP(C) :
M.A.ABDUL NASEER, AGED 44 YEARS S/O.M.M.ALIKKUTTY, MULLAPPILLY HOUSE, NEDUMTHODU MUDICKAL P.O., PERUMBAVPOOR.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.A.ABDUL HAKHIM
SRI.JOSEPH GEORGE (KANNAMPUZHA)
NAME AND ADDRESS OF THE RESPONDENT/6TH RESPONDENT IN WP(C) :
S. RAJAMANIKYAM
AGE NOT KNOWN, FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER DISTRICT COLLECTOR (ERNAKULAM DISTRICT) CIVIL LINES KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM.
BY GOVT. PLEADER SRI.V.K. RAFEEK
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 17-11-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
...2/-
Con.Case(C).No. 989 of 2014 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :
ANNEXURE AI : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) NO. 12122/2013 (M) OF THIS HON'BLE COURT. ANNEXURE AII PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE. ANNEXURE AIII PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE POSTAL A/D CARD.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL
//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE Mn
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.
---------------------------------------
C.O.C. No.989 of 2014
Dated this the 17th day of November, 2014.
JUDGMENT
The learned Government Pleader submits that, the direction
given by this Court as per Annexure AI judgment has been complied with and an order has been passed on 01.11.2014. A copy of the said order is handed over to the learned counsel for the petitioner.
In the said circumstances, this Court finds it not necessary to proceed with any further steps. It is open for the petitioner to challenge the said order, if the same is detrimental to the rights and interests of the petitioner.
The contempt matter is closed accordingly.
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE
sp
M.A. Abdul Naseer
S. Rajamanikyam
P.R. Ramachandran Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court