The Contempt Court closed the proceedings as the respondent produced an order complying with a prior judgment, noting that the prior judgment did not address merits and rights remain reserved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
THURSDAY, THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2014/16TH SRAVANA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 561 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).29219/2013 ----------------------------------------------------IN WP(C) 29219/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER IN W.P.:
---------------------------------
K.O.JOSE @ OUSEPH, AGED 66 YEARS,S/O.OUSEPH, KUNDUPARAMBIL HOUSE, ARIPALAM, THRISSUR.680 688.
BY ADVS.SRI.P.B.SAHASRANAMAN SRI.T.S.HARIKUMAR SRI.K.JAGADEESH
RESPONDENT(S)/3RD RESPONDENT IN THE W.P.:
-----------------------------------------
P.D JAYARAJ, AGED 38 YEARS, FATHERS NAME NOT KNOWN TO THIS PETITIONER, SECRETARY-IN-CHARGE, POOMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. NO.R-712, P.O.ARIPALAM, THRISSUR-680 688.
BY ADV. SRI.K.JAJU BABU (SR.) BY ADV. SMT.M.U.VIJAYALAKSHMI
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 07-08-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
rvs/
Con.Case(C).No. 561 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).29219/2013
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES :
-----------------------
ANNEXURE A1 TRUE PHOTOCOPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE SECRETARY-INCHARGE, POOMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. NO.R-712, TO THE PETITIONER DATED 04/03/2014. ANNEXURE A2 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LETTER ISSUED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT, DATED 28/03/2014. ANNEXURE A3 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE LAWYERS NOTICE, DATED 14/05/2014. ANNEXURE A4 TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF THE REPLY NOTICE, DATED 27/05/2014.
RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES: ------------------------
| ANNEXURE R1(A) | TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER NO.CRP.9599/87 DATED 08/03/1994 ISSUED BY THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY. |
|---|---|
| ANNEXURE R1(B) | TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 12/08/2013 SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER TO THE RESPONDENT. |
| ANNEXURE R1(C) | TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 02/08/2014 OF THE SECRETARY IN CHARGE, POOMANGALAM SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD. |
/true copy/
P.A.TO JUDGE
rvs/
K.VINOD CHANDRAN, J
JUDGMENT
Since the respondent has produced an order which is passed in compliance with Ext.P1 judgment, the Contempt case stands closed. The judgment only directed passing of an order and has not expressed anything on the merits. Hence, definitely the petitioner would have the rights reserved to challenge the said order.
Sd/-
K.VINOD CHANDRAN Judge
Mrcs
//True Copy//
K.O.JOSE @ OUSEPH
P.D JAYARAJ
K VINOD CHANDRAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
