Vinodan A.K v. Prasanna Kumari
Case brief
What is this about?
In this contempt case, the petitioner submitted that the direction in a previous judgment had been complied. The court found no necessity to proceed further and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
Contempt case closed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/14TH JYAISHTA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 435 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).28705/2013
WP(C) 28705/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONER:
VINODAN A.K AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. GOPALAN, CLUSTER CO-ORDINATOR BLOCK RESOURCE CENTRE, VATAKARA PRESENTLY AT BLOCK RESOURCE CENTRE, TUNERI.
BY ADV. SRI.MOHANAN V.T.K.
RESPONDENT(S)/2ND RESPONDENT:
PRASANNA KUMARI DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, KOZHIKODE - 670 001.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinodan A.K
- respondent
Prasnna Kumari
Coram
C.K. Abdul Rehim
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court