Court closed a contempt case where petitioners complained that a regularisation proceeding lacked a specified date of effect, dismissing the grievance as not agitable in contempt proceedings.
Contempt case is hereby closed; petitioners are at liberty to take appropriate steps if any grievance remains regarding the date of effect of regularisation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.K.ABDUL REHIM
WEDNESDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MAY 2014/31ST VAISAKHA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 334 of 2014 (S)
--------------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 26429/2013 DATED 06-11-2013)
PETITIONER(S)/PETITIONERS IN THE WP(C) :
1. C. MOHANAN,AGED 50 YEARS,
2. K. ASOK KUMAR,AGED 47 YEARS, S/O. KUTTAN,
BY ADV. SRI.K.P.RAJEEVAN
RESPONDENT/2ND RESPONDENT IN THE WP(C) :
SRI. K.G. MOHANLAL, (AGE & FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONERS), MANAGING DIRECTOR, KERALA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION, TRANSPORT BHAVAN, FORT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 023.
BY SRI.BABU JOSEPH KURUVATHAZHA,SC,KSRTC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-05-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.334/2014
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX A1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.26429/13 DATED 6/11/2013.
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES:
NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO.JUDGE
sts
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, J.
Con. Case (c) No. 334 OF 2014
DATED THIS THE 21st DAY OF MAY, 2014.
J U D G M E N T
It is submitted by learned Standing counsel that the
petitioners were already regularised in the service, in compliance of the directions contained in Annexure-A1 judgment. Learned counsel for the petitioners concede that a proceeding regularising the petitioners was already issued. But it is complained that the date of effect of the regularisation is not specified. However, it is a matter which cannot be agitated in this contempt of court case. The petitioners will be at liberty to take appropriate steps if there exist any grievance with respect to the date of effect of the regularisation.
Sd/-
C.K. ABDUL REHIM, JUDGE.
AMG
True copy
P.A to Judge
C. Mohanan
K. Asok Kumar
K.G. Mohanlal
C.K. Abdul Rehim
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
