The petitioner and respondents appeared in this contempt case. The Government Pleader submitted that the earlier directions were complied with, leading to the dropping of the case.
Contempt case dropped.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF AUGUST 2014/ 31ST SRAVANA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 215 of 2014 (S)
-------------------------------------------------(AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO. 15296/2011 DATED 03-07-2013)
PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
N. JANARDHANAN NAIR, MANAGER, K.N.N.M.V.H.S, PAVITHRESWARAM, KOTTARAKKARA , KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS:
1. SRI. BHARATH BHOOSHAN E.K., AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER,
CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. SRI. A.SHAJAHAN,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT,GENERAL EDUCATION, HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
3. SRI. K.N.SATHEESH,
AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, THE DIRECTOR OF HIGHER SECONDARY EDUCATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY SR GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JAMAL
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 22-08-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
sts
COC.NO.215/2014
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S ANNEXURES:
ANNEX A1 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.15296 OF 2011 DATED 03/07/2013 ANNEX A2 COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.27677 OF 2003. RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES: NIL
/TRUE COPY/
P.A.TO.JUDGE
sts
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
*** * * * * * * * * * * * *** Cont.Case No.215 of 2014
Dated this the 22nd day of August 2014
J U D G M E N T
Learned Government Pleader submits that the directions issued by this Court have already been complied
with. Hence this contempt case is dropped with liberty to the petitioner to approach this Court, if there is non- compliance of the said directions.
(sd/-)
(A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)
jsr
N. Janardhanan Nair
Sri. Bharath Bhooshan E.K.
Sri. A. Shajahan
Sri. K.N. Satheesh
A.M. Shauffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
