Varkey Joseph v. Sooraj
Case brief
What is this about?
Court found that the directions in a connected writ petition were complied with and amount disbursed, finding no further steps necessary. Contempt matter was closed.
What did the court decide?
Contempt matter closed with no further steps necessary.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
TUESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF MARCH 2014/27TH PHALGUNA, 1935
Con.Case(C).No. 205 of 2014 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 28673/2013 of THIS HON'BLE COURT, DATED 21-11-2013
PETITIONER(S)/WRIT PETITIONERS IN W.P(C)28673/2013(H):
1. VARKEY JOSEPH, AGED 41, S/O.P.V.JOSEPH, PWD CONTRACTOR, PUNNAKKATTU HOUSE, KUMARANALLOOR.P.O, KOTTAYAM.
2. K.Y.NAJEEB, AGED 48 YEARS K.H.YOOSUF PASHA, PWD CONTRACTOR, AL-AMEEN MANZIL, THELLAKOM.P.O, KOTTAYAM.
3. AJITH KUMAR.T.S, AGED 49 YEARS, S/O.K.G.SADASIVAN NAIR, PWD CONTRACTOR, RUGMINI SADANAM, ELAKKAD.P.O, VAYALA VIA, KOTTAYAM-686587.
4. SAJEESH K.LUKOSE, AGED 40 YEARS, S/O.K.L.LUKOSE, PWD CONTRACTOR, KARUKAMALIYIL HOUSE, PERUMPAIKAD.P.O, KOTTAYAM DISTRICT.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
VARKEY JOSEPH
- petitioner
K.Y.NAJEEB
- respondent
SOORAJ
- respondent
PENNAMMA
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court