Disposed

Saji George v. P.I.Sheik Pareeth

Kerala HC1 Apr 2014Con.Case(C)/178/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a contempt of court case arising from a petition regarding land acquisition. The court found that the proceedings were finalized by the respondents on 25.03.2014 via an order granting specific benefits. Accordingly, the court closed the contempt matter.

What did the court decide?

The contempt matter is closed as the proceedings were finalized by the respondents via an order dated 25.03.2014.

Saji George Vs P.I.Sheik Pareeth — Contempt of Court | Kerala HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON

¶4

TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2014/11TH CHAITHRA, 1936

¶5

Con.Case(C).No. 178 of 2014 (S)

¶6

W.P.(C)NO. 24541/2013 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT, DATED 24-10-2013

¶7

PETITIONERS:

¶8

1. SAJI GEORGE, AGED 48 YEARS, S/O.(LATE) THOMAS GEORGE, RESIDING AT THURITHIYILHOUSE, ELAMPAL P.O., VILAKUDY VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM.

¶9

2. GEORGE THOMAS, AGED 62 YEARS, S/O.(LATE) THOMAS GEORGE, RESIDING AT THURITHIYIL HOUSE, ELAMPAL P.O., VILAKUDY VILLAGE, PATHANAPURAM TALUK, KOLLAM.

¶10

3. SUNNY V MATHAI, AGED 56 YEARS, S/O.(LATE) V.T.MATHAI, RESIDING AT VADAKKAN HOUSE, ERAVIMANGALAM P.O., NADATHARA VILLAGE, THRISSUR.

¶11

BY ADVS.SRI.JAISHANKAR V.NAIR SMT.ARATHI KARUNAKARAN SMT.PARVATHY S.KRISHNAN

¶12

RESPONDENT:

¶13

SHEIK PAREETH, (FATHER'S NAME & AGE NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER), DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, COLLECTORATE, KAKKANAD, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 030.

¶14

BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.V.K.RAFEEQ

¶15

THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-04-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

Msd.

¶17

Con.Case(C).No. 178 of 2014 (S)

¶18

APPENDIX

¶19

---------------

¶20

PETITIONER(S)' ANNEXURES:

¶21

ANNEXURE A1: A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 24/10/2013 IN WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO.24541/2013 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT.

¶22

RESPONDENT(S)' ANNEXURES:

NIL

//TRUE COPY//

P.A.TO JUDGE.

Msd.

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, J.

¶28

---------------------------------------

¶29

C.O.C. No.178 of 2014

¶30

Dated this the 1^st day of April, 2014.

¶31

JUDGMENT

¶32

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that, after filing the contempt matter, the proceedings have been finalised by the respondents by passing an order dated 25.03.2014, granting the benefit of Clause 6(2) of the 'KLU Order'.

¶33

In the said circumstances, this Court finds that no further

¶34

steps are necessary.

¶35

The contempt matter is closed accordingly.

¶36

P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE

¶37

Saji George v. P.I.Sheik Pareeth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Saji George v. P.I.Sheik Pareeth

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

E.C.James Vs a.S.Abraham

C.v.Pappachan Vs K.S.H.B.

A.K. Musthafa Vs the Dy. Commissioner (Appeals)

Jamal K.K. Vs P.I.Sheik Pareeth

Sabeena Vs James Rajakumar

Lalithan Vs Sri. Dharmarajan, Thahasildar, Devikulam