Vilasini v. K.a.Francis
Case brief
What is this about?
Pending contempt proceeding where petitioner submitted compliance with court direction; court recorded submission and closed the case.
What did the court decide?
The contempts proceedings were closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
WEDNESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014/14TH KARTHIKA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 1095 of 2014 (S) IN WP(C).21111/2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 21111/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 26-08-2013
PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN WP(C):
1. VILASINI, AGED 65 YEARS W/O LATE KRISHNANKUTTY, THAMARASSERY HOUSE PANANCHERY.P.O., THRISSUR.
2. MADHAVAN
S/O KRISHNAKURUP, ALUKKAPARAMBIL HOUSE PANANCHERY.P.O., THRISSUR.
3. CHANDRAN
S/O AYYAPPAN, PULIKKAL HOUSE, PANANCHERY.P.O. THRISSUR.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vilasini
- petitioner
Madhavan
- petitioner
Chandan
- respondent
K.A. Francis
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court