In this contempt case regarding non-compliance of a Division Bench judgment, the respondents cited an interim stay granted by the Supreme Court. The Court held that no reason existed to proceed and closed the proceedings at that stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN &
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
MONDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2014/17TH AGRAHAYANA, 1936
Con.Case(C).No. 1009 of 2014 (S)
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OP (CAT) 45/2014 OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT DATED 07-04-2014
PETITIONER / PETITIONER :
N.GOPALAKRISHNAN, AGED 60 YEARS S/O.KOCHUNANU, SENIOR GATE KEEPER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY AMABALAPUZHA, RESIDING AT VALAMPARAMBIL AMBALAPUZHA P.O., ALAPPUZHA-688 561.
BY ADV. SRI.MARTIN G.THOTTAN
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 :
1. SHRI. RAKESH MISHRA GENERAL MANAGER (AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SOUTHERN RAILWAY, CHENNAI-600 003).
2. SHRI. JANARDHARAN
(AGE AND FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER) SR.DIVISIONAL PERSONNEL OFFICER, SOUTHERN RAILWAY TRIVANDRUM DIVISION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 014.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.C.S.DIAS, SC
THIS CONTEMPT OF COURT CASE (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 08-12-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Mn
...2/-
Con.Case(C).No. 1009 of 2014 (S)
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS' ANNEXURES :
| ANNEXURE A1 | : CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 7.4.2014 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN OP(CAT) 45 OF 2014. |
|---|---|
| ANNEXURE A2 | COPY OF THE LAWYER NOTICE DATED 5.9.14. |
RESPONDENT'S ANNEXURES : NIL
//TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE Mn
ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag.CJ & A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
*** * * * * * * * * * * * *** Cont.Case.No.1009 of 2014
Dated this the 8th day of December 2014
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ
This contempt case has been filed by the petitioner aggrieved by the non-compliance of the Division Bench judgment dated 07/04/2014 in O.P.(CAT) No.45/2014.
has already been stayed by the Apex Court, we do not see any reason to proceed with the contempt case.
This contempt proceeding is closed at this stage.
(sd/-)
(ASHOK BHUSHAN, ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
(sd/-) (A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE)
jsr
2
3
4
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt proceeding should be proceeded with given the stay by the Apex Court on the underlying judgment.
N. Gopalakrishnan
Rakesh Mishra
Janardharan
Ashok Bhushan
A.M. Shaffique
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
