V.Vijayalakshmi v. Sudheer
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed a material appeal as not-pressed based on a submission that the matter between the parties was settled, consequently closing the cross objection.
What did the court decide?
The material appeal was dismissed as not-pressed and the cross objection was closed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE HARUN-UL-RASHID & THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
THURSDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2014/15TH PHALGUNA, 1935
CO.No. 27 of 2013 () IN Mat.Appeal.60/2013
-------------------------------------------(ORDER IN O.A.NO.100/2012 OF THE FAMILY COURT, KOZHIKODE, DTD.22.8.12)
CROSS APPELLANT/RESPONDENT/PETITIONER
V.VIJAYALAKSHMI, AGED 39 YEARS D/O. V. RAJAN, “AMMU” MUNDHYADINILAM, EASTHILLA ATHANIKKAL P.O. PUTHIYANGADI, KOZHIKODE TALUK PIN:673 005.
BY ADV. SRI.P.S.SREEDHARAN PILLAI
RESPONDENT/APPELLANT/RESPONDENT:
SUDHEER KARUVATH,, AGED 42 YEARS S/O SUDHAKARAN, PALLIKKOTTUVAYAL, ATHANIKKAL P.O. WEST HILL, KACHERI AMSOM, DESOM KOZHIKODE TALUK, PIN:673 005.
Parties & counsel
- respondent
Sudheer Karuvath
Coram
Harun-ul-Rashid
Alexander Thomas
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court