Disposed

Suresh v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC13 Feb 2014Bail Appl./995/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application regarding an alleged Sec. 498A IPC offence was admitted. The court directed the accused to surrender within two weeks for interrogation. The magistrate was instructed to grant bail on specific conditions involving sureties, passport submission, and affidavits against tampering.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender within two weeks; Magistrate to grant bail on conditions of sureties, interrogation availability, passport submission, and non-tampering affidavit.

Suresh Vs State of Kerala — Matrimonial and Divorce | Kerala HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN

¶4

THURSDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2014/24TH MAGHA, 1935

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 995 of 2014 ()

¶6

CRIME NO. 33/2014 OF NOORANADU POLICE STATION , ALAPPUZHA

¶7

ACCUSED(S)/PETITIONER:

¶8

SURESH AGED 34 YEARS PARAPURATHU VEEDU, PULIMEL MURI, NOORNADU

¶9

BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL

¶10

COMPLAINANT(S)/RESPONDENTS:

¶11

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA THROUGH S.I. OF POLICE NOORNADU

¶12

R BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN

¶13

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-02-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶14

das

¶15

N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J.

¶16

==========================

¶17

B.A. No. 995 of 2014

¶18

===================================

¶19

Dated this the 13^th day of February, 2014

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.33/2014 of Nooranadu police station, Alappuzha district. The offence alleged against the accused is under Sec.498A IPC.

¶22

The complaint is filed by the wife of the petitioner

¶23

stating that she was subjected to physical and mental cruelty demanding more dowry. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegations are not true.

¶24

Considering all the aspects the following directions are issued:

¶25

The petitioner shall surrender before the Investigating Officer within two weeks from today. After interrogation the accused shall be produced before the learned Magistrate. When applied for bail by the accused, the

¶26

B.A. No. 995/2014

¶27

-: 2 :-

¶28

learned Magistrate will, considering the nature of the case, grant bail to the petitioners but on the following conditions:

¶29

a. The accused shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate. If in case the Magistrate has any doubt about the genuineness or correctness of the tax receipts produced by the sureties, the learned Magistrate can insist for production of the attested photo copies of the original title deeds of the sureties.

¶30

b. The accused shall make himself available for interrogation by the Investigating Officer and should appear before the Investigating Officer on all Mondays between 9.30 AM to 11.30 AM until further orders.

¶31

c. The accused shall produce his original passport before the learned jurisdictional Magistrate. If he is not having any valid passport, he should file an affidavit regarding the same before the Magistrate.

¶32

d. The accused will also file affidavit that they will abide by all the conditions as mentioned above and that they will not commit any offence similar to the offence involved in this case and will not directly or

¶33

-: 3 :-

¶34

B.A. No. 995/2014

¶35

indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶36

e. The learned Magistrate will also ensure the identity of the sureties by insisting production of electoral photo identity cards/Driving licence etc.

¶37

sd/- N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE

¶38

das

¶39

// True copy // PA to Judge

Suresh v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rahul Vs State of Kerala

C.G.Raju @ Pandyan, C.NO.525, Central Prision Kannur Vs State of Kerala

Karattuchalil Noushad Vs State of Kerala

Janeesh Kumar Vs the S.I. of Police

Saji Vs State of Kerala

Chithra Vs State of Kerala