Single judge bail application under Section 439(1) Cr.P.C. regarding cheating and forgery involving inhalant abuse. Bail dismissed due to lack of reasonable grounds to believe petitioner is not guilty or likely to commit offence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
FRIDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF MAY 2014/12TH VAISAKHA, 1936
Bail Appl..No. 2904 of 2014
CRIME NO. 20/2014 OF BADIADKA EXCISE RANGE OFFICE, KASARAGODE DISTRICT
PETITIONER/ACCUSED:
PURUSHOTHAMA, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O.POKKA VELICHAPPADU, KATTA BASAR, HOSANGADI, KASARAGODE TALUK.
BY ADVS.SRI.K.PRAVEEN KUMAR SMT.ANN SUSAN GEORGE
RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT/STATE:
1. EXCISE RANGE OFFICER, BADIADKA EXCISE RANGE, KASARAGODE 673 121.
2. STATE OF KERALA
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.REJI JOSEPH
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-05-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
B.A.No. 2904 of 2014
Dated this the 2nd May, 2014
ORDER
Petition filed under Section 439(1) Cr.P.C. read with Section 41A
Abkari Act.
In the result, this application is dismissed.
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE
cms
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail under Section 439(1) Cr.P.C. in an offence under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act.
3 provisions across 2 enactments
Purushothama
State of Kerala
K. Abraham Matthew
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
