Allowed

Sharafudheen v. State of Kerala

Kerala HC11 Jun 2014Bail Appl./2403/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application filed by accused Nos. 3 to 5 in a criminal case involving affray and other offences, the High Court of Kerala granted bail subject to strict conditions including surrender for interrogation, cooperation with investigation, and payment of bond with sureties, distinguishing their liability from Accused 1 and 2.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed. Petitioners granted bail to surrender for interrogation and cooperate with investigation, subject to conditions including reporting every alternate Saturday and executing bond wit

Sharafudheen Vs State of Kerala — Bail and Remand | Kerala HC (2014)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

¶2

PRESENT:

¶3

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE THOMAS P.JOSEPH

¶4

WEDNESDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2014/21ST JYAISHTA, 1936

¶5

Bail Appl..No. 2403 of 2014

¶6

CRIME NO. 2530/2013 OF KOTHAMANGALAM POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM

¶7

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS. 3 TO 5:

¶8

1. SHARAFUDHEEN, AGED 23 YEARS, S/O. ABDUL SALAM, PARAKKAKUDI HOUSE, NELLIKUZHI KARA, ERAMALLOOR VILLAGE.

¶9

2. SANOJ, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O. ALIYAR, KAPPELIL HOUSE, NELLIKKUZHI KARA, ERAMALLOOR VILLAGE.

¶10

3. AJMAL, AGED 22 YEARS, S/O. MUHAMMED, PADINJARECHALIL HOUSE, NELLIKKUZHI KARA, ERAMALLOOR VILLAGE.

¶11

BY ADVS.SRI.JAISON JOSEPH SRI.P.P.PRAVEEN

¶12

RESPONDENTS:

¶13

STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM REPRESENTING SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHAMANAGALAM POLICE STATION.

¶14

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA

¶15

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-06-2014, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

¶16

Kss

¶17

THOMAS P. JOSEPH, J

¶18

B.A.No.2403 of 2014

¶19

Dated this the 11^th day of June, 2014

¶20

ORDER

¶21

Petitioners are accused Nos.3 to 5 in Crime No.2530 of 2013 of the Kothamangalam Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 341, 308, 324, 323 r/w Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code, apprehend arrest and have filed the application.

¶22

Learned Public Prosecutor has opposed the application. It is submitted that on 25.12.2013 at about 06.15 p.m., the petitioners and others restrained the de facto complainant who was riding a motor cycle and assaulted him with iron rod.

¶23

Learned counsel submits that the allegations are

¶24

not true.

¶25

On hearing both sides, it appears that the incident occurred on account of a dispute over overtaking vehicles. Accused 1 and 2 are said to have used the iron rod while the petitioners are said to have kicked and fisted the de facto complainant. Since no recovery is required to be made from the petitioners/accused 3 to 5, I am inclined to grant relief to them subject to conditions so that investigation is not affected.

¶26

B.A.No.2403 of 2014

¶27

¶28

Application is allowed as under:

¶29

(i) Petitioners/accused 3 to 5 shall surrender before the

¶30

Officer investigating Crime No.2530 of 2013 of the Kothamangalam Police Station on 17.06.2014 at 10 a.m for interrogation.

¶31

(ii) In case interrogation is not completed that day, it is open to the officer investigating the case to direct presence of the petitioners on other day/days and time as may be specified by him which the petitioners shall comply.

¶32

(iii) Petitioners shall co-operate with investigation of the

¶33

case.

¶34

(iv) In case arrest of the petitioners is recorded, they shall be produced before the jurisdictional magistrate the same day.

¶35

(v) On such production the petitioners shall be released on bail (if not required to be detained otherwise) on their executing bond for Rs.20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand only) each with two sureties each for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the learned magistrate and subject to the following conditions:

¶36

(a) One of the sureties shall be a close relative of any of the petitioners.

¶37

B.A.No.2403 of 2014

¶38

¶39

(b) Petitioners shall report to the officer investigating the case on every alternate Saturday between 10.00 a.m. and 12.00 p.m. for a period of two months or until filing of the final report whichever is earlier.

¶40

¶41

(d) Petitioners shall not, during the period of this bail get involved in any offence.

¶42

(e) Petitioners shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses.

¶43

(vi) It is made clear that in case any of condition Nos. (b) to (e) is violated, it is open to the Investigating Officer to seek cancellation of the bail granted hereby by moving application before the learned magistrate (until committal of the case if any, and thereafter before the learned Principal Sessions Judge concerned) as held in P.K. Shaji V. State of Kerala (AIR

¶44

2006 Supreme Court 100).

¶45

Sd/-

¶46

THOMAS P. JOSEPH, JUDGE.

¶47

¶48

/True Copy/

¶49

P.A. to Judge

Sharafudheen v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sharafudheen v. State of Kerala

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Abhilash Vs State of Kerala

Denny Vs State

Ashraf Vs State of Kerala

S.K. Jayachandran Vs State of Kerala

Faizal P. Vs State of Kerala

Ashraf Vs the Sub Inspector of Police