Disposed
Sudeendran v. State of Kerala
Kerala HCWP(C)/7968/2013
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.M.JOSEPH &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAMAKRISHNAN
THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF APRIL 2013/14TH CHAITHRA 1935
WP(C).No. 7968 of 2013 (U)
PETITIONER(S):
SUDEENDRAN, AGED 65 YEARS, S/O. SANKU, 'ROSHINI', AYIRAKAR VILLAGE, ELAKAMAN, VENKODE, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.E.S.ASHRAF
RESPONDENT(S):
1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
2. THE ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, SOUTH ZONE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 001.
4. SRI. SHAJI, CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 141.
5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARKALA POLICE STATION, VARKALA, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 141.
R1 TO R3 & R5 BY STATE ATTORNEY SMT.M.T.SHEEBA
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 04-04-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 7968 of 2013 (U)
:: ::
APPENDIX
PETITIONER(S)' EXHIBITS:
EXHIBIT.P1 TRUE COPY OF THE DISCHARGE SUMMARY ISSUED BY THE TALUK HOSPITAL, VARKALA.
EXHIBIT.P2 TRUE COPY OF THE SAID COMPLAINT.
EXHIBIT.P2(a) TRUE COPY OF THE RECEIPT RECEIVED BY THE PETITIONER DATED 1-3-2013.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL
//true copy//
P.A. To Judge
sk/-
K.M.JOSEPH & K.RAMAKRISHNAN, JJ.
W.P.(C) No.7968 of 2013
----------------------------------------Dated, this the 4th day of April, 2013
J U D G M E N T
K.M.Joseph, J.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, petitioner is intending to withdraw Ext.P2 complaint and that the writ petition can be closed. In view of the above submission, the writ petition is closed.
(K.M.JOSEPH) JUDGE.
( K.RAMAKRISHNAN) JUDGE.
MS
Sudeendran
State of Kerala
K.M.Joseph
K.Ramakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court