L.P.Satheeshkumar v. K.S.F.D.Corporation
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala disposed of a writ petition by relying on a prior judgment. The court directed that the petitioner be allowed to continue in service as long as other similarly situated employees also continue in service, given the lack of formal approval for regularisation.
What did the court decide?
Directed petitioner to continue in service as long as similarly situated employees continue.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.P.RAY
TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/16TH MAGHA 1934
WP(C).No. 30896 of 2005 (C)
PETITIONER(S):
L.P.SATHEESHKUMAR, ELECTRICIAN, KERALA STATE FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED VAZHUTHACAUD, TRIVANDRUM. BY ADVS.SRI.V.G.ARUN SRI.T.R.HARIKUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
- KERALA STATE FILM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, TRIVANDRUM REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, CULTURAL AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT TRIVANDRUM. R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.GOPALAKRISHNAN NAIR R,R1 BY ADV. SRI.A.ABDUL KHARIM R, BY ADV. GOVERNMENT PLEADER THOMAS JOHN AMBOOKAN R,R-1 BY ADV. SRI.A.SUDHI VASUDEVAN, SC, KSFDC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner, who was appointed similarly to others without Public Service Commission approval, should continue in service while pending determination of regularisation for all employees.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
L.P. Satheeshkumar
- respondent
Kerala State Film Development Corporation Limited
- respondent
State of Kerala
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court