K.Krishnakumar v. the Cochin Devaswom Board
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
MONDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/11TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935
WP(C).No. 25229 of 2013 (C)
PETITIONER:
K.KRISHNAKUMAR AGED 62 YEARS S/O.LATE KRISHNA MENON, KUTTIKKATTU HOUSE PALLIPARAMBU KAVU, NADAMA VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE
RESPONDENTS:
BY SRI.V.KRISHNA MENON, SC, COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 02-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 25229 of 2013 (C)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS :
EXHIBIT-P1: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF PROCEEDINGS.
EXHIBIT-P2: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF REPRESENTATION DATED 02.07.2012 BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
EXHIBIT-P3: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF COMMUNICATION DATED 11.10.2012 ALONGWITH THE STATEMENT.
EXHIBIT-P4: THE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF ORDER WAS PASSED ON 08.08.2012 BY THE HON'BLE OMBUDSMAN IN COMPLAINTS 71/2012.
EXHIBIT-P5: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY ORDERS WERE PASSED BY THE HON'BLE OMBUDSMAN ON 17.01.2013 IN COMPLAINTS 327/2012.
EXHIBIT-P6: TRUE PHOTOSTAT COPY OF COMPLAINT DATED 17.03.2013 BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 2ND RESPONDENT.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS : NIL
// True Copy //
PA to Judge
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
B.KEMAL PASHA, JJ.
W.P.(C) No.25229 of 2013 C
Dated this the 2nd day of December, 2013
J U D G M E N T
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Ramachandran Nair, J.
Petitioner herein is seeking for a direction to see
that audit of the accounts of the Temple Advisory Committee of Palliparambukavu temple, Tripunithura, will have to be completed within a time frame. The petitioner has produced in the writ petition Ext.P5 report made by the learned Ombudsman in a complaint filed by the petitioner himself, wherein the learned Ombudsman observed that while conducting the audit of the accounts of the Committee, the views of the complainant will also be taken into account and report prepared.
WPC.25229/2013
: 2 :
Superintendent of the Maramath Wing to conduct the auditing within one month. We record the same. The said Officer will take into account the objection of the petitioner also while conducting the auditing, for which the petitioner will transmit a copy of the objection within ten days from today.
Writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/- (T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE)
Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE)
aks/02/12
// True Copy //
PA to Judge
K.KRISHNAKUMAR
THE COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD
THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER COCHIN DEVASWOM BOARD
THE ASST.COMMISSIONER TRIPUNITHURA GROUP
THE DEVASWOM OFFICER CHAKKUMKULANGARA DEVASWOM
THE PALLIPARAMBUKAVU KSHETHRA ADVISORY COMMITTEE
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR
B.KEMAL PASHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court