absent for more than 8 years and seek for reinstatement and regularisation of service assigning such a palpably, unsustainable reason, that too after his dismissal from service as far back in the year 2005. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner then, submitted that a direction may be give to the respondents to consider another application submitted by the petitioner on 27.09.2013 seeking compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the Central Civil Service Pension Rules. The said application has been produced as Ext.P4 along with I.A.No.13061 of 2013. Ext.P4 representation seems to have been submitted before the 2nd respondent and since it is pending before the authorities I do not propose to make any observation with respect to the merits of the claims or contentions raised in Ext.P4 in so far as to the prayer for compassionate allowance. Ext.P4 is submitted before the second respondent. Obviously the second respondent is competent to look into Ext.P4 to pass orders thereon. In the said circumstances, while holding that the petitioner is not entitled to reinstatement into the service and also regularisation of the period of absence, without making any observation as to the merits of the contentions raised by the
