Santhamma v. Tahsildar
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Kerala, via a one-line order, dismissed the writ petition because the petitioner did not press the matter before the court on the date of hearing.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition was dismissed as not pressed.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.R.RAMACHANDRA MENON
FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF NOVEMBER 2013/1ST AGRAHAYANA, 1935
WP(C).No. 19557 of 2012 (T)
PETITIONER :
SANTHAMMA, W/O.KUNJUKRISHNAN, AGED 64 YEARS, MYLADUMPARAYIL HOUSE, N.R.CITY P.O., RAJAKKAD VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN
RESPONDENT(S):
1. TAHASILDAR, DEVIKULAM TALUK, DEVIKULAM, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 685 613.
2. VILLAGE OFFICER, PALLIVASAL VILLAGE, IDUKKI DISTRICT. 685 565.
3. MANOJ M. @ RAJAN, S/O.MADHAVAN, MOONGAMACKAL HOUSE, POWER HOUSE, CHITHIRAPURAM P.O., PALLIVASAL VILLAGE, DEVIKULAM TALUK. 685 565.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Santamma
- respondent
Tahasildar, Devikulam
- respondent
Manoj M. @ Rajan
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court