The High Court of Kerala dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, accepting the counsel's submission that the interim order had been given effect to.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
TUESDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JANUARY 2013/11TH POUSHA 1934
WP(C).No. 10297 of 2012 (J)
PETITIONER(S):
MUHAMMED YUNIS, ANADIYIL HOUSE, AYANCHERY, VATAKARA.
BY ADVS.SRI.G.PRABHAKARAN SMT.R.PADMAKUMARI
RESPONDENT(S):
1. THE SECRETARY, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY
2. THE REGIONAL TRNASPORT AUTHORITY
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SRI.JAMES MATHEW KADAVAN.
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 01-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
stu
V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
= = = = = = = = = = =
W.P.(C) No.10297 of 2012
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = =
Dated this the 1st day of January, 2013
J U D G M E N T
The Counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ petition
has become infructuous and that the interim order has been give effect to.
The Writ Petition (Civil) is hence dismissed as infructuous.
V.CHITAMBARESH. JUDGE
smm
2
Muhammed Yunis
The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority
The Regional Transport Authority
V.Chitambaresh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
