Geevar Paul v. Jose
Case brief
What is this about?
Second appeal against dismissal of a money decree. The High Court affirmed the lower appellate court's finding that evidence of cheque execution was insufficient and the suit was rightly dismissed on purely evidentiary grounds.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 8TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/19TH MAGHA 1934
RSA.No. 1431 of 2012 ()
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS.105/2011 of SUB COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED 21-08-2012
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS.41/2009 of MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR DATED 07-03-2011
APPELLANT(S)/PLAINTIFF:
GEEVAR PAUL AGED 50 YEARS S/O.PAULOSE, CHERUVATHOOR HOUSE, ERUMELI KUNNATHUNADU VILLAGE.
BY ADVS.SRI.JOBY JACOB PULICKEKUDY SRI.ANIL GEORGE
RESPONDENT(S)/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Geevar Paul
- respondent
Jose
Coram
N.K. Balakrishnan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court