The High Court held that the appeals were infructuous and dismissed them as such.
Dismissal of the appeals as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.BALAKRISHNAN
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/26TH MAGHA 1934
RSA.No. 1036 of 2003 (F)
-----------------------AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN AS.32/1998 of DISTRICT COURT,THRISSUR DATED 28-02-2001
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS.183/1994 of MUNSIFF COURT,CHAVAKKAD DATED 23-09-1997
APPELLANT(S):
LAZAR, S/O. NEYYAN KUNJUVAREED CHEMMANUR, ARTHAT- 680521 (DIED)
ADDL. APPELLANT
LISSY, D/O, LATE LAZAR, NEYYAN HOUSE, CHEMMANNUR BAZAR ARTHAT
BY ADV. SRI.A.K.CHINNAN
RESPONDENT(S):
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 15-02-2013, ALONG WITH SA. 536/2000, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
das
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, J.
================== R.S.A No.1036 of 2003
&
S.A. No. 536 of 2000
=========================
Dated this the 15th day of February, 2013
JUDGMENT
Memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the
appellant stating that these appeals may be dismissed as infructuous.
Hence, these two appeals are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/-
N.K.BALAKRISHNAN, JUDGE
das
// True copy //
PA to Judge
Lazar / Lissy
Neelima Kuries and Loans (P) Ltd / Philominla / George
N.K. Balakrishnan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
