The review petition filed against a previous order in WP(C) No.33970/2009 was dismissed. The court found no satisfaction regarding a case of error justifying review power exercise.
Review petition dismissed for lack of sufficient grounds showing error in the impugned judgment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2013/26TH MAGHA 1934
RP.No. 60 of 2013
-----------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C).NO.33970/2009 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA DATED 30-11-2012
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER:
MURUGAN, AGED 53 YEARS, S/O.POTTIVELU, MANAGING PARTNER, M/S.HOTEL S.P.GRAND DAYS, PANAVILA JUNCTION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.NAIR AJAY KRISHNAN SRI.R.T.PRADEEP
RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT:
CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, CORPORATION OFFICE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY ADV. SRI.P.K.MANOJKUMAR, SC
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-02-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Kss
ANTONY DOMINIC,J
R.P. No.60 of 2013
Dated this the 15th day of February, 2013
ORDER
I am not satisfied that the petitioner has made out a
case of error in the judgment justifying the exercise of the
power of review.
Sd/- ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE
ln
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's grounds sufficiently show error in the earlier judgment to warrant a review.
MURUGAN
CORPORATION OF THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
