Emjay Builders v. Syndicate Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ANTONY DOMINIC
FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2013/15TH BHADRA, 1935
RP.No.355 of 2013(I)IN WP(C)NO.3890/2013
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C)NO.3890/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA, DATED 08-02-2013
REVIEW PETITIONERS/PETITIONERS IN W.P.C):
BY ADV. SRI.JIMMY JOHN VELLANIKARAN
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS IN WPC:
BY ADV.SRI.R.S.KALKURA
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-09-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ANTONY DOMINIC, J.
R.P.No.355 of 2013
in W.P.(c) No.3890 of 2013
------------------------------------------Dated this the 06th day of September, 2013
ORDER
The learned counsel for the review petitioners submits
that this Review Petition is not pressed.
Accordingly, the Review Petition is dismissed as not
pressed.
Sd/-
ANTONY DOMINIC, JUDGE.
ln
/True copy/
P.A. to Judge.
EMJAY BUILDERS
M.P.JOY
M.J.JINOY
M.J.JETTO
SYNDICATE BANK
ANTONY DOMINIC
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court