K.C Pratheepkumar v. Pramod Kumar
Case brief
What is this about?
COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
FRIDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2013/14TH POUSHA 1934
RP.No. 1221 of 2012 () IN OPC/4171/2012
---------------------------------------AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN .NO./ IN OPC.4171/2012 DATED 07-12-2012
REVIEW PETITIONER(S):
1. K.C PRATHEEPKUMAR
2. DR.KAVITHA SEKHAR
BY ADVS.SRI.M.BALAGOVINDAN SRI.T.K.ANANDA PADMANABHAN SRI.S.SHIBU KUMAR
RESPONDENT(S):
PRAMOD KUMAR
S/O.PURUSHOTHAMAN ,VRINDAVANAM, ADAYAMON P.O ,THATATHUMALA KILIMANOOR, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK
BY SRI.M.R.RAJESH
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-01-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
= = = = = = = = = = =
R.P. No.1221 of 2012
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 4th day of January, 2013
O R D E R
The review petitioners were the respondents in the original petition and had accepted notice as evident by the order dated 5-12-2012. They were heard in detail while disposing of the original petition and the very same arguments are repeated in the review petition as well. There is no error apparent on the face of record warranting interference in review.
The Review Petition is dismissed.
V.CHITAMBARESH. JUDGE
smm
2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is an error apparent on the face of record warranting interference in the review petition.
K.C PRATHEEPKUMAR
DR.KAVITHA SEKHAR
PRAMOD KUMAR
V.CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court