This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE V.CHITAMBARESH
WEDNESDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/27TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935
RP.No. 1004 of 2013 () IN WP(C).26665/2013
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 26665/2013 of HIGH COURT OF KERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER /PETITIONER:
GEETHA C.R, AGED 46 YEARS W/O K.V. GOSH, NAIMANAPARAMBIL, KATTISSERI PANANGAD, KUMBALAM VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK ERNAKULAM DISTRICT 682506
BY ADV. SRI.T.K.RADHAKRISHNAN
RESPONDENT /RESPONDENT:
PEOPLES URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED NO 51, TRIPUNITHURA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, 682301
R BY SRI.DEVAPRASANTH.P.J.
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 18-12-2013, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
RP.No. 1004 of 2013 () IN WP(C).26665/2013
APPENDIX
PETITIONERS ANNEXURE
ANNEXURE 1 COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.12946 DATED 26-11-2013 FOR RS.40,000/- ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK
ANNEXURE 2 COPY OF THE RECEIPT NO.13193 DATED 2-12-2013 FOR RS. 7,500/- ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK
RESPONDENTS EXHIBITS NIL
TRUE COPY
P.A TO JUDGE
SMM
V.CHITAMBARESH,J.
= = = = = = = = = = = R.P No.1004 of 2013
in
W.P(C)No.26665 of 2013
= = = = = = = = = = = == = = = = Dated this the 18th day of December, 2013
I do not find sufficient ground to further extend the time to
pay the amounts which have fallen overdue.
There is no error apparent on the face of the record and the Review Petition is dismissed.
V.CHITAMBARESH JUDGE
smm
GEETHA C.R
PEOPLES URBAN CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED
V. CHITAMBARESH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
