Lice Baby v. Annie Mathew
Case brief
What is this about?
This judgment dismisses a regular first appeal because the learned counsel for the appellant abandoned the appeal and did not press the matter.
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed as not pressed. No costs.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR &
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA
TUESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2013/26TH AGRAHAYANA, 1935
RFA.No. 552 of 2005 ( ) ------------------------
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN OS 570/2000 of II ADDL.SUB COURT,ERNAKULAM DATED 19-01-2005 APPELLANT(S)/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT: ---------------------------------------------------------------ALICE BABY, AGED 46, W/O.BABY, MORUKATTIL HOUSE, KARIKKODE MULANTHURUTHY.
BY ADVS.SRI.VARGHESE C.KURIAKOSE SRI.PRAVEEN K. JOY SRI.VARGHESE BABU SRI.P.J.ANTONY
RESPONDENT(S)/PLAINTIFF:
ANNIE MATHEW, AGED 25, D/O.MATHEW, MORUKATTIL HOUSE, RESIDING AT MYALIL HOUSE KOTHAMANGALAM, KOTHAMANGALAM P.O., NOW W/O.KALISTER, ATTIPETTI HOUSE, OCHANTHURUTHU ERNAKULAM DISSTRICT.
R, BY ADV. SRI.P.M.JOSHI
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Alice Baby
- respondent
Annie Mathew
Coram
T.R. Ramachandran Nair
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court